How AI is applied across API Evangelist and APIs.io. Read my AI disclosure →
API Evangelist API Evangelist
Discovery
Learnings
Guidance
Toolbox
Alignment
API Evangelist LLC

Why should I care about the history of APIs?

history_edu History & Landscape Updated August 12, 2026

Short answer

Because almost every "new" idea in this space is a returning one, and knowing the previous round tells you which problems are genuinely solved and which are about to be rediscovered at expense.

Because you will save yourself a great deal of money.

Microservices repeated SOA’s mistakes almost move for move — the technical decoupling was easy, the organizational decoupling never happened, and both efforts failed the same way a decade apart. gRPC is CORBA’s direct intellectual descendant, and it succeeded precisely where CORBA failed by narrowing its scope instead of trying to be everything. The industry rediscovers service discovery, schema registries and contract-first design roughly every eight years, each time with a new name and no memory of the previous attempt.

History also corrects the triumphalist story this field tells itself, which is that each new style obsoletes the last. RPC did not die and then come back; it was always there. REST did not replace everything; it became the pragmatic center of a diverse toolbox. SOAP is not gone; it is running in production in most large enterprises right now.

The practical use of all this is calibration. When someone tells you a new protocol changes everything, knowing what happened the last four times lets you ask the right question — which is not “is this real?” but “what is the narrow context where this genuinely fits, and what will it cost when it is used outside that context?”

Go deeper in the guidance

This answer is distilled from the API Evangelist guidance catalog — the long-form treatment of each topic, with its own citations back into sixteen years of writing.